Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

Actual time of departure


Author
Message
kjep
kjep
Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.1K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6, Visits: 11
I've been using the iPad version for a little more than a month now and am generally very impressed. There is one thing I can't find though: is there a way to see the Actual Time of Departure after take-off? It's not in the live PLOG (only times over route waypoints). Obviously I can find it in the flight log after landing, but it would be nice to see it while still airborne.
Replies
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)SkyDemon Team (690K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 9.7K
Not easily, no, because we want to use HTML as a good format for the PLOG. We want to use HTML because it's great at finding the best layout for tabular data and letting the user pinch zoom in and out. It also makes it straightforward for us to offer the same PLOG across multiple platforms.
Sky Painter
Sky Painter
Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)Too Much Forum (54K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 627, Visits: 15K
Not being a coder, HTML et al is a complete mystery to me, but now that you've explained it, I understand where you are coming from.

Mike
_________________________________________
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 – Android 11.0 & SD 4.2.2
Huawei P30 – Android 11.0 & SD 4.2.2
PC – Windows 10 (Home Ed) Version 22H2, Build 19045.
6575, SD 4.2.2

ckurz7000
ckurz7000
Too Much Forum (69K reputation)Too Much Forum (69K reputation)Too Much Forum (69K reputation)Too Much Forum (69K reputation)Too Much Forum (69K reputation)Too Much Forum (69K reputation)Too Much Forum (69K reputation)Too Much Forum (69K reputation)Too Much Forum (69K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 538, Visits: 2.2K
Hi Tim, here are my thoughts.

First, I would think that there ought to be two PLOGs, a planning version when on the ground and a flying version when actually navigating.

The user ought to be able to customize which columns are displayed in each, simply because needs differ. The flying version ought to be "live" in the sense that all values are updated dynamically as the flight progresses.

In my personal flying version I would opt for the following columns:

Waypoint ID: ID or full name as per selection in the chart settings
leg length: that would actually be distance to next waypoint and updated live. For passed points: planned distance.
ground speed: easy, updated live. For passed points: average ground speed.
ETA: live and based on actual off block time. For passed points: ATA
cumulative fuel used: (based on aircraft profile climb/descent profile and elapsed time)
cumulative distance flown: live
cumulative time flown: live
comm frequency: suggested by SD but user editable.
All heading/course/wind correction stuff I get from following the magenta line on the map. The altitude, climb and descent I get from the vertical profile.

Greetings, -- Chris.


GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
kjep - 9/10/2014 5:59:02 PM
Tim Dawson - 9/11/2014 10:33:38 AM
srayne - 9/11/2014 10:47:06 AM
pseudonym - 9/11/2014 11:43:00 AM
                 Second that. -- Chris.
ckurz7000 - 9/12/2014 11:54:58 AM
                     +1
Mike@EDTG - 9/12/2014 1:19:19 PM
Tim Dawson - 9/15/2014 11:12:17 AM
pseudonym - 9/15/2014 11:32:44 AM
Mike@EDTG - 9/15/2014 8:06:01 PM
Tim Dawson - 9/16/2014 3:27:17 PM
ckurz7000 - 9/17/2014 7:00:38 AM
Tim Dawson - 9/17/2014 3:38:15 PM
Mikernav - 9/17/2014 5:03:49 PM
ckurz7000 - 9/18/2014 8:03:39 AM
dave_kent - 9/18/2014 12:37:00 PM
             I'm with Chris and Dave on this as well.
Sky Painter - 9/18/2014 8:21:20 PM
Tim Dawson - 10/14/2014 10:49:42 AM
Sky Painter - 10/14/2014 3:32:38 PM
Tim Dawson - 10/14/2014 3:57:27 PM
Sky Painter - 10/14/2014 4:47:40 PM
ckurz7000 - 10/14/2014 7:55:03 PM
Tim Dawson - 10/16/2014 9:50:13 AM
Sky Painter - 10/16/2014 10:53:59 AM
ckurz7000 - 10/17/2014 6:56:36 AM
Tim Dawson - 10/17/2014 2:13:57 PM
ckurz7000 - 10/21/2014 7:29:13 AM
Tim Dawson - 10/22/2014 4:35:14 PM
ckurz7000 - 10/23/2014 1:36:20 PM
Tim Dawson - 10/23/2014 4:13:17 PM

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search